Yasmine Kabbaj vs Sarah Van Emst Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jul at 10:39 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Kabbaj vs S. Van Emst

MAR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kabbaj 1 - 0 Emst
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yasmine Kabbaj winning 2 and Sarah Van Emst winning 0. The last match between Yasmine Kabbaj and Sarah Van Emst was at the W35 Casablanca, 18-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Yasmine Kabbaj getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kabbaj | 1 |
| Emst | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Casablanca(07-18-25)
Y. Kabbaj vs S. V. Emst H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.24% (106-59) | Career Total W/L | 61.31% (84-53) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. Kabbaj vs S. V. Emst Match Preview:
- How does performance on second serve compare? Emst has recently won 40.05% of points on their second serve, outperforming Kabbaj's 34.2%. This is crucial for predicting match outcomes.
- In the return game, Emst captures 51.43% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Kabbaj leads slightly with 56.44%.
- Regarding first serve returns, Emst trails with 33.72% compared to Kabbaj's 38.08%, revealing Kabbaj's edge in this area.
- What happens under pressure? Emst saves 44.57% of breakpoints, while Kabbaj shows resilience with a 48.63% save rate.
- Overall match performance over the last year shows Emst winning 64.81% of their matches against Kabbaj’s 69.12%, favoring Kabbaj slightly.
- On which surfaces do they excel? Emst has a high performance on Hard courts with a 71% win rate. In contrast, Kabbaj excels on Clay with a 69% win rate, struggling on Hard with only 40% wins.
- When considering the level of play, Emst mostly competes at Futures/ITF $10K, winning 63.89% of matches, while Kabbaj participates in higher-level Challenger or ITF > $10K, with a 67.57% success rate.
- Average opponent rank is also telling; Emst faced opponents with an average rank of 398.98. Kabbaj's adversaries were slightly higher ranked, averaging 387.28.
- If it comes down to a deciding set, Emst holds a 31% win rate, whereas Kabbaj is stronger at 57% in such scenarios.
- In current form, Emst converts 45.14% of breakpoints, just shy of Kabbaj's 48.11%, indicating Kabbaj's efficiency in critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (July 18, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming match, it's clear that Kabbaj has a slight edge based on several recent form statistics, including higher breakpoint conversion rates and more efficient first and second-serve returns.
Emst, although strong on hard courts and showing better performance in second serve points, has played against lower-ranked opponents on average and struggles in deciding sets compared to Kabbaj.
Given the trends in recent performance and the level of competition faced, Kabbaj is anticipated to edge out a victory in this encounter.
Yasmine Kabbaj vs Sarah Van Emst Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Kabbaj vs S. V. Emst H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:20:26 | Average Match Time | 1:20:26 |
| 77% (40/52) | 1st Serve % | 54% (25/46) |
| 70% (28/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (14/25) |
| 50% (6/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (6/21) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/5) |
| 57% (26/46) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Kabbaj Recent Matches Played
S. V. Emst Recent Matches Played

Y. Kabbaj vs S. V. Emst Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.24% (106/59) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.31% (84/53) |
| 60.65% (225/146) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.99% (187/130) |
| 55.46% (1812/1455) | Games Win/Loss | 54.63% (1598/1327) |
| 39.13% (9/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.63% (35/16) |
| 68.57% (96/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.32% (47/35) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 45 | Aces Total | 160 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 587 | Total Double Faults | 496 |
| 1:33:46 | Average Match Time | 1:35:12 |
| 439.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.85 |
| 74% (7147/9626) | 1st Serve % | 56% (4580/8133) |
| 57% (4086/7147) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2894/4580) |
| 41% (1025/2479) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1611/3553) |
| 52% (704/1348) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (535/1093) |
| 50% (4698/9372) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3910/8151) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 61.17% (63/40) | Challenger W/L | 60.38% (32/21) |
| 75.44% (43/14) | Futures W/L | 62.65% (52/31) |
| 64% (101/159) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (80/133) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 64% (16/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (15/26) |
| 63% (27/43) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (23/45) |
| 91% (99/90) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (77/68) |
| 9% (99/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (77/9) |
| 21% (66/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (60/15) |